Continued consternation re: Castro-Huerta
House on fire or pants on fire?
Updated August 18, 8:50 p.m. — see Editor’s note.
In response to our recent posting of Mary Kathryn Nagle’s feelings about and explanation of the June U.S. Supreme Court decision in Castro-Huerta, several people have emailed and/or commented on social media that the decision need not be seen as so dire for tribal sovereignty at large.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial